Published claim files
The World against Israel Case
Evidence archive and research command center for claim files, source chains, public source links, and debunk packs.
Binghamton SJP stated an intent to campaign for BDS in 2018
This record verifies only Binghamton SJP's dated self-description of its intended BDS campaigning. It does not establish the adjacent allegations on the page, speak for National SJP or other chapters, or make any factual, legal, discrimination, or liability finding.
Mondoweiss’s 7 July 2026 report on the UAW divestment vote
Verified as the first sentence of Mondoweiss’s written standfirst, credited to Michael Arria on 7 July 2026. UAW’s own convention-closing report confirms that delegates voted to divest (https://uaw.org/uaw-closes-out-39th-constitutional-convention-with-unified-vision-for-the-fights-ahead/); it does not document completed sales or the investment amount. ALAA/UAW Local 2325’s 23 June release dates the vote to 18 June and reports 321–287, while distinguishing a broader proposal that did not advance (https://www.alaa.org/media-releases/local-2325-pushes-uaw-to-approve-divestment-from-israeli-bonds). The full Mondoweiss article itself says the executive board’s response is unclear and that broader measures did not advance. Its reported $400,000 and first-major-union characterization are attributed reporting, not independently audited holdings or an exhaustive historical finding. A vote is not proof of completed divestment. StandWithUs opposed the vote in its 19 June statement (https://standwithus.com/news/standwithus-condemns-bds-vote-and-antisemitism-targeting-union-members-in-uaw/). The competing sources’ allegations about discrimination, crimes, motives and legal responsibility are not adopted or adjudicated here; no such allegation about any person or organization is established by this record.
National SJP announced its Popular University for Gaza campaign on 20 April 2024
Evidence solely of the Steering Committee announcement on its own website. The campaign called for university divestment; its demands and allegations about administrators, repression and complicity are the organizations advocacy, not findings adopted by this platform. No conclusion about implementation, campus conduct, antisemitism, unlawfulness or individual responsibility.