Strong source layer
Court, official, military/LOAC, watchdog, or explicitly role-labeled high-value material.
Published evidence file
sjp-binghamton-stated-bds-campaign-intent-2018
Overall verdict
Binghamton SJP stated an intent to campaign for BDS in 2018.
This record verifies only Binghamton SJP's dated self-description of its intended BDS campaigning. It does not establish the adjacent allegations on the page, speak for National SJP or other chapters, or make any factual, legal, discrimination, or liability finding.
Verified publisher statement only. This record verifies only Binghamton SJP's dated self-description of its intended BDS campaigning. It does not establish the adjacent allegations on the page, speak for National SJP or other chapters, or make any factual, legal, discrimination, or liability finding.
Separates a dated organization position from adjacent allegations and legal conclusions.
Court, official, military/LOAC, watchdog, or explicitly role-labeled high-value material.
Context, methodology, legal analysis, and assessment-supporting sources.
Videos, transcripts, debates, timestamps, or source pages that prove what was said or published.
Allegation and amplification records; useful for tracing the claim, not proof of the accusation.
This file is claim-source heavy. Treat repeated media/NGO/institutional references as amplification until stronger counter-record and methodology sources are read.
Rotate, zoom, and select nodes to see how the claim and its evidence sources sit together. Click a node to zoom into it; double-click a claim or evidence node to open it. This is the exploratory view; the source list below remains the audit view.
This organization intends to campaign for boycotts, divestments, and sanctions (BDS) against politicians, institutions and corporations that support Zionism and fund the State of Israel.
This record verifies only Binghamton SJP's dated self-description of its intended BDS campaigning. It does not establish the adjacent allegations on the page, speak for National SJP or other chapters, or make any factual, legal, discrimination, or liability finding.
Open sourcehttps://sjpbing.wordpress.com/about/
Bottom-source disposition: dated Binghamton SJP self-description only. This record verifies only Binghamton SJP's dated self-description of its intended BDS campaigning. It does not establish the adjacent allegations on the page, speak for National SJP or other chapters, or make any factual, legal, discrimination, or liability finding.
Locator: Opening paragraph of the entry-content section; article:published_time 2018-10-02T02:28:39+00:00.
Quote rule: Opening paragraph of the entry-content section; article:published_time 2018-10-02T02:28:39+00:00.
https://sjpbing.wordpress.com/about/
Who first made the concrete allegation?
Did it move through UN, NGO, court, media, or activist channels?
What official, legal, military, or methodology evidence tests it?
Did it become sanctions, lawfare, campus pressure, or media shorthand?