Nested dossier hub
Area C administration equals annexation
claim-2026-area-c-administration-de-facto-annexation-claim-1967-2026
Partly supported / context neededAssessment confidence: high1 public pack(s)
Overall verdict
Partly supported / context needed
Nested claim
Nested dossier claim
Israel’s civil administration, planning/enforcement practices, and settlement growth in Area C amount to annexation (not mere disputed-territory administration pending negotiations).
Summary
The claim argues that Israel’s control of Area C—via the Civil Administration’s planning and enforcement regime, the channeling of resources and approvals to settlements, and 2023–2024 governance changes placing key authorities with Minister Bezalel Smotrich—constitutes de facto (and functionally de jure) annexation of West Bank territory. It travels through UN mechanisms, legal and policy think tanks, European bodies, and media analyses that highlight both long-term settlement entrenchment and institutional shifts that bypass the Oslo interim framework.
Debunk
Assessment
The claim is partly true with high confidence. The strongest current legal record, especially the ICJ's 19 July 2024 advisory opinion and the 2026 OHCHR reporting, supports the characterization that Israeli policies and practices in Area C and the wider West Bank amount to de facto or partial annexation. That includes settlement expansion, planning/enforcement, displacement pressure, application of Israeli civilian authority to settlers, and governance changes that shift powers from military to civilian hands. The qualifier matters: Israel has not enacted a blanket de jure annexation of Area C, and Israeli institutions still formally present the Civil Administration/COGAT framework as occupation-law administration pending final-status arrangements. The correct verdict is therefore not false and not merely disputed: de facto annexation is substantially supported, while de jure annexation remains absent.
Why it matters
If Area C governance constitutes annexation, it would trigger serious consequences under international law and diplomacy, affect final-status negotiations, Palestinians’ rights and land access, and foreign states’ policies (sanctions, recognition, arms sales, and legal proceedings).
How to read this dossierOptional guide
Nested file
This dossier belongs to a broader parent accusation and also has its own tracks.
Track rollup
Partly supported tracks
High-confidence reads
Claim-side items
12 claim-side11 counter-evidence32 legal / method69 context
Source quality audit26 strong source(s)
Strong source layer
Court, official, military/LOAC, watchdog, or explicitly role-labeled high-value material.
Legal / method layer
Context, methodology, legal analysis, and assessment-supporting sources.
Primary locator layer
Videos, transcripts, debates, timestamps, or source pages that prove what was said or published.
Claim-side layer
Allegation and amplification records; useful for tracing the claim, not proof of the accusation.
This file has explicit source-chain edges; read the sequence below before treating repetitions as independent proof.
The center node is the verdict on the bundled accusation. The surrounding tracks are narrower factual, legal, source-chain, or LOAC questions. Evidence counts show whether each track is mainly claim-side, debunk-side, legal/context, or mixed.
Court / legal / methodologyOfficial / counter-evidenceClaim-side / allegationContext / needs reading
Overall: Partly supported / context needed
Area C administration equals annexation
The claim is partly true with high confidence. The strongest current legal record, especially the ICJ's 19 July 2024 advisory opinion and the 2026 OHCHR reporting, supports the characterization that Israeli policies and practices in Area C and the wider West Bank amount to de facto or partial annexation. That includes settlement expansion, planning/enforcement, displacement pressure, application of Israeli civilian authority to settlers, and governance changes that shift powers from military to civilian hands. The qualifier matters: Israel has not enacted a blanket de jure annexation of Area C, and Israeli institutions still formally present the Civil Administration/COGAT framework as occupation-law administration pending final-status arrangements. The correct verdict is therefore not false and not merely disputed: de facto annexation is substantially supported, while de jure annexation remains absent.
No connected tracks match this map filter yet.
Rotate, zoom, and select nodes to see how the parent accusation, evidence tracks, and evidence sources sit together. Click a node to zoom into it; double-click a claim or evidence node to open it. This is the exploratory view; the matrix below remains the audit view.
Track
Claim-side evidence
Counter-evidence
Legal / method
Result
No rows match this map filter yet.
02Area C splitDebunked: legally inaccurate
Israeli settlements are illegal under international law
Keeps Area C administration and planning enforcement separate from the legality of settlements.
02Area C administrationPartly supported / context needed
Annexation via settlements?
Separates Area C civil administration and planning enforcement from the broader annexation conclusion.
Broad accusations are split into precise evidence tracks so legal standards, source claims, military necessity, warnings, intent, and counter-evidence can be checked separately. These tracks are shown here as supporting analysis, not as separate headline claims in the main search.
01ICJ advisory weightTrack legally inaccurateAssessment confidence: high
ICJ 2024 AO is a binding annexation ruling on Area C?
Clarifies advisory vs contentious case effects.
02Domestic postureTrack legally inaccurateAssessment confidence: high
Area C: 2023–2024 governance shifts = de jure annexation?
Separates administrative centralization from formal annexation acts.
03Practice vs lawTrack legally inaccurateAssessment confidence: high
Area C: practice vs. law on ‘de facto annexation’
Creates a lane for factual practice feeding into annexation characterizations.
claim_sourcesource leadInternational Court of Justice (via UNISPAL)2024-07-19
Advisory Opinion: Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem
The ICJ’s 2024 advisory opinion determined that Israeli policies and practices in the occupied Palestinian territory amount to annexation of large parts of that territory.
Primary legal opinion concluding that Israel’s policies/practices amount to annexation of large parts of the OPT; directly invoked by claimants regarding Area C governance.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf
Claim sourceInternational Court of JusticeClaim-side sourceSource reliability: high
Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 (case page)
Official case portal for authoritative documents and press materials.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/node/204160
Claim sourcePeace NowClaim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
Israeli government assigns sole settlement-planning responsibility to Smotrich (June 18, 2023)
Consolidated description of the decision’s operative effects; should be paired with the official Hebrew decision.
Open sourceShow URL
https://peacenow.org.il/en/israel-transfers-west-bank-settlements-planning-responsibility-to-minister-smotrich-cancels-defense-ministers-involvement
Claim sourceACRI (with Yesh Din)Claim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
The Appointment of a Civilian Deputy in the Civil Administration = de facto annexation (position + HCJ petitions)
Primary legal correspondence/petition framing the 2024 restructuring as annexation in Israeli law terms.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.english.acri.org.il/post/the-appointment-of-a-civilian-as-deputy-head-of-the-civil-administration-constitutes-a-de-facto-anne
Claim sourceUN OCHA oPtClaim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
OCHA – Most Palestinian plans to build in Area C not approved
Empirical basis for restrictive planning regime used by claimants as evidence of de facto annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.ochaopt.org/content/most-palestinian-plans-build-area-c-not-approved
Claim sourceInternational Court of JusticeClaim-side sourceSource reliability: high
Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 (case page + PDFs)
Primary legal opinion that characterizes Israeli policies/practices as amounting to annexation of large parts of the OPT; includes majority, separate and dissenting opinions.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.icj-cij.org/case/186
Claim sourceUnited Nations (UNISPAL mirror)Claim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024
Primary summary where the ICJ characterizes Israeli policies/practices as amounting to annexation of large parts of the OPT.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/186-20240719-sum-01-00-en.pdf
Claim sourceBreaking the Silence (document scan)Claim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
Smotrich–Gallant Memorandum (Feb 23, 2023) – Eng. translation
Primary text evidencing transfer/reallocation of authorities cited as steps toward annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.breakingthesilence.org.il/inside/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Galant-Smotrich-agreement-eng.pdf
Claim sourceAxios report with decision detailsClaim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
Cabinet decision to expedite settlement approvals (June 18, 2023)
Contemporaneous reporting on the structural planning change; should be supplemented with the official Hebrew decision text.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2023/06/18/israel-west-bank-settlements-biden-admin-tensions-smotrich
Claim sourceUN/ICJ via UNISPALClaim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024 (Summary 2024/8)
Authoritative summary explicitly stating the ‘annexation of large parts’ conclusion for use in precise quotation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/186-20240719-sum-01-00-en.pdf
Claim sourceInternational Court of Justice (via UNISPAL)Claim-side sourceSource reliability: high
Advisory Opinion: Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem
Primary legal opinion concluding that Israel’s policies/practices amount to annexation of large parts of the OPT; directly invoked by claimants regarding Area C governance.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf
Claim sourceAssociation for Civil Rights in IsraelClaim-side sourceSource reliability: medium
ACRI/Yesh Din petition: ‘Abolish the new regime structure … constituting annexation’ (Sept 26, 2024)
Primary litigation challenging the Smotrich framework as annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.english.acri.org.il/post/abolish-the-new-regime-structure-in-the-west-bank-which-constitutes-as-annexation
Legal debunkCardozo Israeli Supreme Court ProjectLegal analysisSource reliability: high
HCJ 390/79 Dweikat (Elon Moreh) – English
Classic ruling rejecting private-land seizure for ideological settlement; anchors occupation-law analysis.
Open sourceShow URL
https://versa.cardozo.yu.edu/opinions/dweikat-et-al-v-state
Context evidenceIsrael Democracy InstituteContext sourceSource reliability: medium
Emergency Regulations (Judea & Samaria—Jurisdiction and Legal Aid) explainer
Authoritative explanation of ‘pipelining’ Israeli law to settlers—key to the de facto annexation debate.
Open sourceShow URL
https://en.idi.org.il/articles/39012
Context evidenceAxiosContext sourceSource reliability: medium
U.S. warning: Transfer of West Bank authority to Smotrich = step toward annexation
Diplomatic context on how governance changes are viewed internationally.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2023/02/09/biden-israel-far-right-smotrich-west-bank-annexation
Legal debunkBegin CenterLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Golan Heights Law (1981) – Text and analysis
Contrasts with West Bank: formal application of Israeli ‘law, jurisdiction and administration’ by statute.
Open sourceShow URL
https://db.begincenter.org.il/en/article/the-golan-heights-law/
Counter-evidenceAxiosContext sourceSource reliability: high
U.S. Defense Secretary Austin says U.S. has no evidence Israel is committing genocide
Date-stamped U.S. government position that it had not found evidence of genocide; useful as official counter-record, not as a court adjudication. Matched by Priority-A source family: intent, icj.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2024/04/09/israel-genocide-gaza-us-austin-palestinians
Methodology / source hygieneAmnesty International IsraelSource hygieneSource reliability: high
Amnesty Israel: The Alternative Hypothesis to Israeli Intent to Commit Genocide
Internal NGO methodological counterweight on genocide intent and alternative explanations for Israeli conduct. Matched by Priority-A source family: intent, icj.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.amnesty.org.il/2024/12/08/the-alternative-hypothesis-to-israeli-intent-to-commit-genocide/
Context evidenceUN OCHA oPtClaim-side NGO / institutionSource reliability: medium
Most Palestinian plans to build in Area C not approved
Empirical planning-approval context for Area C.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.ochaopt.org/content/most-palestinian-plans-build-area-c-not-approved
Context evidenceState of Israel (Ministry of Defense/COGAT)Primary / officialSource reliability: high
COGAT Civil Administration – Planning Bureau (Area C)
Official description of the planning authority for Area C (Higher Planning Council and subcommittees) under the Civil Administration.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.gov.il/he/departments/units/planning_bureau_unit
Legal debunkRefworld (UNHCR) hosting Israel Supreme Court textLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Mara’abe v. Prime Minister of Israel, HCJ 7957/04 (Israeli Supreme Court)
Authoritative Israeli jurisprudence applying the law of belligerent occupation to the West Bank; counters the view that Israel has de jure annexed Area C.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4374aa674.pdf
Legal debunkECF / KnessetLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel (English)
Illustrates the legal form of de jure annexation absent in Area C.
Open sourceShow URL
https://content.ecf.org.il/files/M00008_BasicLaw-JerusalemCapitalofIsrael-EnglishText_0.pdf
Context evidenceUN Digital LibraryPrimary / officialSource reliability: medium
UNSC Resolution 2334 (2016) – Text
Security Council position on settlement illegality and non-recognition of changes to 1967 lines.
Open sourceShow URL
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/853446?v=pdf
Legal debunkInternational Court of JusticeLegal analysisSource reliability: high
ICJ Advisory Opinion summary: Israeli policies amount to annexation of large parts of the OPT
Primary legal source for de facto annexation, settlements, Area C displacement, systemic discrimination and third-state duties in the OPT advisory opinion.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.icj-cij.org/node/204176
Context evidenceOHCHR / United NationsPrimary / officialSource reliability: high
OHCHR: Israel's settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank
UN source characterizing accelerated settlement expansion and annexation of large parts of the occupied West Bank, including displacement evidence.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/document/press-release-israels-settlement-expansion-drives-mass-displacement-west-bank-ohchr-report/
Legal debunkIsrael Supreme Court (via Refworld)Legal analysisSource reliability: high
Beit Sourik Village Council v. Government of Israel (HCJ 2056/04)
Seminal case applying belligerent-occupation law to the West Bank; counters claims of de jure annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.refworld.org/docid/4374ac594.html
Context evidenceIndependent archive (translation; primary text)Context sourceSource reliability: medium
Military Order No. 947 (1981): Establishment of the Civil Administration (Judea & Samaria) – English translation
Primary legal basis creating the Civil Administration that governs planning/enforcement in Area C under occupation law.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.geocities.ws/savepalestinenow/israelmilitaryorders/fulltext/mo0947.htm
Context evidenceUnited Nations (UNISPAL)Primary / officialSource reliability: high
Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement (Oslo II) – main text
Sets the interim legal-administrative framework: Area C under Israeli control pending phased transfer and permanent-status negotiations.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/?p=185434
Context evidenceUNISPALPrimary / officialSource reliability: medium
Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement (Oslo II) – Main Text
Defines Areas A/B/C and interim allocation of powers pending negotiations.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.un.org/unispal/?p=185434
Context evidenceInstitute for National Security Studies (INSS)Context sourceSource reliability: medium
INSS Special Publication: The Struggle over Area C (Hebrew)
Israeli security think-tank analysis warning that policy implementation in Area C risks sliding into one-state reality/de facto annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.inss.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/special-publication-230823-1.pdf
Legal debunkCardozo Israeli Supreme Court ProjectLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Mara’abe v. Prime Minister of Israel (HCJ 7957/04)
Confirms Israeli courts’ occupation-law framework for the West Bank; useful for authoritative quotes.
Open sourceShow URL
https://versa.cardozo.yu.edu/opinions/mara%E2%80%99abe-v-prime-minister-israel
Legal debunkRefworld (UNHCR) / Cardozo Israeli Supreme Court ProjectLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Mara’abe v. Prime Minister of Israel (HCJ 7957/04)
Authoritative judgment applying the law of belligerent occupation to the West Bank.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4374aa674.pdf
Legal debunkIsrael Ministry of Foreign AffairsLegal analysisSource reliability: high
ICJ | Israel and International Law
Official Israeli legal hub for ICJ filings and statements, useful for provisional-measures posture, genocide-intent rebuttal, and advisory-opinion context. Matched by Priority-A source family: icj, intent, aid.
Open sourceShow URL
https://israelihl.mfa.gov.il/icj
Legal debunkCambridge University PressLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Israel Law Review: Did the ICJ Act Ultra Vires? The Gaza Genocide Orders
Scholarly legal critique of ICJ provisional-measures reasoning, plausibility, rights-vs-facts distinctions, and genocide-intent posture. Matched by Priority-A source family: icj, intent.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/israel-law-review/article/did-the-icj-act-ultra-vires-the-orders-on-the-convention-on-the-prevention-and-punishment-of-the-crime-of-genocide-in-the-gaza-strip/7F77B6FE9B0E7BC004910DEF53343739
Context evidenceAxiosContext sourceSource reliability: medium
U.S. warns Smotrich transfer would be a step toward annexation (Feb. 9, 2023)
Shows U.S. characterization of the 2023 power shift as a step toward annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2023/02/09/biden-israel-far-right-smotrich-west-bank-annexation
Context evidenceWashington Post (report) or AxiosContext sourceSource reliability: medium
Blinken: Settlements are inconsistent with international law (Feb. 23, 2024)
Establishes current U.S. legal-diplomatic framing relevant to the annexation narrative.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/israel-settlements-blinken-pompeo-trump-illegal
Context evidenceEEAS (EU)Context sourceSource reliability: medium
EU one-year report on Israeli settlements (Reporting period Jan–Dec 2023)
Documents EU view that 2023 governance changes (incl. Smotrich’s role) advance annexation-like control.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/2024/One-Year%20Report%20on%20Israeli%20Settlements%20in%20the%20occupied%20West%20Bank,%20including%20East%20Jerusalem%20(Reporting%20period%20January%20-%20December%202023).pdf
Counter-evidenceState of Israel (gov.il)Primary / officialSource reliability: high
COGAT – Central Planning Bureau (Area C)
Official description of Area C planning and the Higher Planning Council under the Civil Administration.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.gov.il/en/departments/units/planning_bureau_unit
Context evidenceAxiosContext sourceSource reliability: medium
Blinken reverses Trump-era stance; settlements ‘inconsistent with international law’
Current U.S. legal-diplomatic position relevant to annexation framing.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2024/02/23/israel-settlements-blinken-pompeo-trump-illegal
Context evidenceThe Times of IsraelContext sourceSource reliability: medium
Netanyahu hands Smotrich full authority to expand existing settlements
Reports cabinet decision streamlining settlement planning under Smotrich; cited by many as advancing annexation-like control over Area C planning.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-hands-smotrich-full-authority-to-expand-existing-settlements/
Legal debunkECF / KnessetLegal analysisSource reliability: high
Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel (1980) – English text
Shows how de jure annexation is effected in Israeli law—absent for Area C.
Open sourceShow URL
https://content.ecf.org.il/files/M00008_BasicLaw-JerusalemCapitalofIsrael-EnglishText_0.pdf
Counter-evidenceCOGAT (Israeli MOD)Primary / officialSource reliability: high
Planning Bureau (Area C) – Civil Administration
Official description of the planning authorities and statutory bodies under occupation-law structures.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.gov.il/he/departments/units/planning_bureau_unit
Context evidenceUN (UNSCO/UNISPAL)Context sourceSource reliability: medium
Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement (Oslo II) – Main Text
Defines Areas A/B/C and leaves Area C under Israeli control during the interim period pending negotiations.
Open sourceShow URL
https://unsco.unmissions.org/sites/default/files/israeli-palestinian_interim_agreement_on_the_west_bank_and_the_gaza_strip.pdf
Context evidenceThe Washington Institute for Near East PolicyContext sourceSource reliability: medium
Israel expands settlements as Smotrich increases authority
Policy analysis from a U.S. think tank describing structural changes and their implications.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/israel-expands-settlements-smotrich-increases-his-authority
Legal debunkBegin Center (and ILM)Legal analysisSource reliability: high
Golan Heights Law (text)
Shows how Israel has formally extended sovereignty elsewhere; contrasts with Area C.
Open sourceShow URL
https://db.begincenter.org.il/en/article/the-golan-heights-law/
Context evidenceAxiosContext sourceSource reliability: medium
Scoop: U.S. tells Israel if Smotrich gets West Bank authority it’s step toward annexation
U.S. diplomatic warning that transferring Civil Administration authorities to Smotrich would be seen as a step toward annexation.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.axios.com/2023/02/09/biden-israel-far-right-smotrich-west-bank-annexation
Legal debunkUnited Nations Security CouncilLegal analysisSource reliability: high
UNSC Resolution 2334 (2016) – text
Reaffirms settlements have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation under international law; central to the legal backdrop of annexation claims.
Open sourceShow URL
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/853446?v=pdf
Counter-evidenceAmnesty International IsraelClaim-side NGO / institutionSource reliability: high
Amnesty Israel does not accept the main findings of Amnesty International's Gaza genocide report
Internal Amnesty dissent rejecting key genocide-report conclusions, useful against laundering NGO institutional authority into settled genocide intent. Matched by Priority-A source family: intent, icj.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.amnesty.org.il/2024/12/05/%D7%90%D7%9E%D7%A0%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%99-%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A8%D7%90%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%99%D7%A0%D7%95-%D7%9E%D7%A7%D7%91%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%AA-%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%A7%D7%A8%D7%99-%D7%93%D7%95%D7%97-%D7%94%D7%92/
Counter-evidenceAl-Haq (Heb/Ar text inc.) / mirror translationsClaim-side NGO / institutionSource reliability: high
Military Order No. 947 (1981): Establishment of the Civil Administration
Primary legal basis for the Civil Administration; shows occupation-law governance rather than sovereignty extension.
Open sourceShow URL
https://www.alhaq.org/cached_uploads/download/alhaq_files/publications/Civilian_Administration_in_the_Occupied_West_Bank.pdf
1Origin claim
Who first made the concrete allegation?
2Institution / NGO lift
Did it move through UN, NGO, court, media, or activist channels?
3Counter-record
What official, legal, military, or methodology evidence tests it?
4Consequence
Did it become sanctions, lawfare, campus pressure, or media shorthand?
Territory or residency dispute becomes blanket illegality claim
claim_origin
A real land, planning, settlement, or violence controversy is converted into a sweeping claim about all Israelis or all policy.
Legal status, individual conduct, state policy, and security context are merged
category_collapse
The file should separate private land, public land, Oslo/Area status, Article 49(6), violence, enforcement, and political rhetoric.
Legal and statistical record narrows the claim
legal_threshold
The assessment should preserve valid criticism while rejecting conclusions that exceed the legal or evidentiary record.
Copy/paste debunk packs
enpublic concise
ICJ (July 19, 2024) says Israel’s West Bank policies amount to de facto annexation, but Israel hasn’t formally annexed Area C and its courts still apply occupation law—so the claim is disputed, not settled.
Area C ≠ formally annexed. ICJ (7/19/2024) says Israel’s West Bank policies amount to de facto annexation. Israel denies annexation; its Supreme Court applies occupation law. Oslo II still frames Area C as interim. Conclusion: disputed claim.