Published claim files

The World against Israel Case

Evidence archive and research command center for claim files, source chains, public source links, and debunk packs.

Open brain mapHow evidence is weightedSource authority
Main dossiers first.Component evidence tracks are hidden from the default list so the archive reads as headline dossiers plus evidence modules, not hundreds of disconnected accusations.
GenocideBundled accusation, intent threshold, ICJ/ICC context, source-chain and evidence tracks.Hospitals / LOACParent verdict with facility tracks, warnings, military use, evacuation and feasibility questions.ApartheidLegal-category audit with citizenship, West Bank, security restrictions and source roles separated.Rafah Tel al-SultanIncident-level LOAC file: target, munitions, secondary explosions and attribution limits.US aid / AIPACSeparates U.S. aid, foreign influence, FARA, university funding and domestic advocacy lanes.Anti-ZionismIdentity, antisemitism, slogan, campus and public-discourse source chains.
All status groupsDebunkedDisputedPartly supportedUnder investigation
Main dossiersInclude evidence tracksEvidence tracks only
GenocideFamine / aidLawfareSettlements / landOctober 7HostagesHospitals / healthDetainees / prisonsMedia / journalistsUN / NGO chainsCampus / BDSApartheid / racismWeapons claimsCasualty dataSource laundering
Showing 5 of 272 component evidence track(s)Clear filters

Status rule

Verdicts apply to the public accusation; component tracks stay attached below parent dossiers.
bundled claim
DebunkedMisleadingLegally inaccuratePartly supported / context needed
Debunked: misleadingAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)4 high-authorityEvidence track
ICJ / state legal recordStrategic / technical reference
Settlements / landMedia / journalistsUN / NGO chainsSource laundering

‘Settler sanctions rely on unverified NGO/UN claims’

This narrative, promoted by some Israeli officials, advocacy groups, and commentators, asserts that U.S./UK/EU sanctions on certain Israeli settlers and outposts rest on politicized or laundered claims from UN OCHA and NGOs rather than on robust, government-verified evidence. It circulates via think‑tank papers, op-eds, and movement press statements.

Debunked: misleadingAssessment confidence: medium1 pack(s)2 high-authorityEvidence track
Fact-check / watchdog record
Source laundering

Corrections = propaganda?

The claim argues that any post‑hoc correction (e.g., edited video, revised figures, changed description) invalidates Israel’s broader account of events and shows it is propaganda‑driven.

Debunked: misleadingAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)Evidence track
Media / journalistsSource laundering

Israel pays influencers/bots on Gaza

The allegation combines two ideas: state‑funded influence campaigns that pay social‑media personalities and covert networks of fake or automated accounts (‘bots’) pushing pro‑Israel narratives. It spread widely after 2023 via media reports, watchdog findings, and posts asserting $7,000‑per‑post payouts.

DebunkedAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)2 high-authorityEvidence track
Fact-check / watchdog record
October 7Source laundering

ZAKA claimed '40 beheaded babies' and is therefore not credible

A secondary claim that attributes the false '40 beheaded babies' merger to ZAKA and uses it to attack ZAKA's broader October 7 credibility.

DebunkedAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)1 high-authorityEvidence track
ICJ / state legal record
Apartheid / racismSource laundering

“Pinkwashing” makes LGBTQ rights evidence irrelevant

Activists argue Israeli institutions promote LGBTQ-friendly messaging to distract from abuses against Palestinians (“pinkwashing”), concluding that any Israeli LGBTQ rights evidence is mere PR and should be disregarded.