Published claim files

The World against Israel Case

Evidence archive and research command center for claim files, source chains, public source links, and debunk packs.

Open brain mapHow evidence is weightedSource authority
Main dossiers first.Component evidence tracks are hidden from the default list so the archive reads as headline dossiers plus evidence modules, not hundreds of disconnected accusations.
GenocideBundled accusation, intent threshold, ICJ/ICC context, source-chain and evidence tracks.Hospitals / LOACParent verdict with facility tracks, warnings, military use, evacuation and feasibility questions.ApartheidLegal-category audit with citizenship, West Bank, security restrictions and source roles separated.Rafah Tel al-SultanIncident-level LOAC file: target, munitions, secondary explosions and attribution limits.US aid / AIPACSeparates U.S. aid, foreign influence, FARA, university funding and domestic advocacy lanes.Anti-ZionismIdentity, antisemitism, slogan, campus and public-discourse source chains.
All status groupsDebunkedDisputedNarrow evidence tracksUnder investigation
Main dossiersInclude evidence tracksEvidence tracks only
GenocideFamine / aidLawfareSettlements / landOctober 7HostagesHospitals / healthDetainees / prisonsMedia / journalistsUN / NGO chainsCampus / BDSApartheid / racismWeapons claimsCasualty dataSource laundering
Showing 3 of 272 component evidence track(s)Clear filters

Status rule

Verdicts apply to the public accusation; component tracks stay attached below parent dossiers.
bundled claim
DebunkedMisleadingLegally inaccurateNarrow track partly supported
DebunkedAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)21 high-authorityEvidence track
ICC court recordGenocide / ICJ critiqueICJ / state legal record
GenocideFamine / aidLawfareUN / NGO chains

UNRWA ban = hiding genocide?

The claim argues Israel’s legal and operational moves against UNRWA—funding suspensions, revoking facilitation agreements, blocking convoys, and legislating a domestic ban—aim to dismantle aid delivery and conceal genocidal acts. It travels via op-eds, social posts, and statements from UN officials and NGOs using terms like “campaign to dismantle UNRWA” and “starvation used as a weapon.”

Debunked: legally inaccurateAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)4 high-authorityEvidence track
Fact-check / watchdog recordStrategic / technical reference
Famine / aidLawfare

Do all 1948 refugees' descendants have a legal right to enter Israel?

A legal-right claim built from UNGA 194, UNRWA descendant registration, and political right-of-return language.

Debunked: misleadingAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)10 high-authorityEvidence track
Casualty methodologyOfficial operational dataFact-check / watchdog record
Famine / aidUN / NGO chainsCasualty data

Israel targets UN facilities and staff

The claim asserts a purposeful Israeli campaign against UN sites (esp. UNRWA schools/clinics/warehouses) and personnel. It draws on repeated strikes on UN‑marked shelters, UNRWA casualty tolls, and attacks on convoys; it is often framed as 'systematic targeting' rather than collateral damage or strikes on embedded militants.