Published claim files

The World against Israel Case

Evidence archive and research command center for claim files, source chains, public source links, and debunk packs.

Open brain mapHow evidence is weightedSource authority
Main dossiers first.Component evidence tracks are hidden from the default list so the archive reads as headline dossiers plus evidence modules, not hundreds of disconnected accusations.
GenocideBundled accusation, intent threshold, ICJ/ICC context, source-chain and evidence tracks.Hospitals / LOACParent verdict with facility tracks, warnings, military use, evacuation and feasibility questions.ApartheidLegal-category audit with citizenship, West Bank, security restrictions and source roles separated.Rafah Tel al-SultanIncident-level LOAC file: target, munitions, secondary explosions and attribution limits.US aid / AIPACSeparates U.S. aid, foreign influence, FARA, university funding and domestic advocacy lanes.Anti-ZionismIdentity, antisemitism, slogan, campus and public-discourse source chains.
All status groupsDebunkedDisputedNarrow evidence tracksUnder investigation
Main dossiersInclude evidence tracksEvidence tracks only
GenocideFamine / aidLawfareSettlements / landOctober 7HostagesHospitals / healthDetainees / prisonsMedia / journalistsUN / NGO chainsCampus / BDSApartheid / racismWeapons claimsCasualty dataSource laundering
Showing 2 of 272 component evidence track(s)Clear filters

Status rule

Verdicts apply to the public accusation; component tracks stay attached below parent dossiers.
bundled claim
DebunkedMisleadingLegally inaccurateNarrow track partly supported
Debunked: legally inaccurateAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)6 high-authorityEvidence track
Genocide / ICJ critiqueICC court recordICJ / state legal record
GenocideLawfareUN / NGO chainsApartheid / racism

Are UNHRC/UN experts’ arms-embargo calls legally binding?

The claim circulates after Human Rights Council (HRC) resolutions called on States to halt arms transfers to Israel and groups of UN special rapporteurs urged embargoes. Headlines and advocacy posts sometimes frame these as UN-imposed or binding embargoes on all States, implying automatic legal duties beyond national export laws or Security Council sanctions.

Debunked: legally inaccurateAssessment confidence: high1 pack(s)21 high-authorityEvidence track
Casualty methodologyMilitary / LOAC expertsICJ / state legal record
LawfareUN / NGO chains

Are Gaza flotilla interceptions ‘piracy’ or unlawful attacks?

Activist flotillas in 2025–2026 were intercepted by the Israeli Navy in international waters. Organizers and several governments called the boardings ‘piracy’ and ‘kidnapping.’ Israel replied it was enforcing a ‘lawful naval blockade.’ Earlier inquiries (2010) split: a UN Secretary‑General panel (Palmer) found the blockade and high‑seas enforcement lawful (but criticized force used), while a UN Human Rights Council mission found the blockade unlawful. Whether the 2026 boardings are legal depends on the blockade’s lawfulness and compliance with naval LOAC; but ‘piracy’ and ‘kidnapping’ labels misstate black‑letter law.